Short instruction

Generally, and highly simplified, the story goes like this. Some actors (e.g., companies, alliances of companies and organizations, research institutes, universities, and many other types of organizations) have a problem and need, for many distinct reasons, to find a solution with others. Some organizations – let’s call them standardisation organizations – provide a place and a specific framework (e.g., rules, process, project management) for actors to develop a joint solution. Finding a solution to common problems with others can happen outside the organization for standardisation. A company can create a joint solution by directly inviting other companies; this standardisation is often called standardisation based on cooperation.
Sometimes actors create their own alliances in specific sectors and act by their own rules – that is the case of Consortia-based standardisation. However, the story is more complicated and much more interesting. Without standards, world trade will be impossible because “standards control access to virtually every market in global commerce and directly affect more than eighty per cent of world trade” (Purcell & Kushnier, 2016). There are many active standards organizations
5 with thousands of members who develop tens of thousands of standards every year (Baron & Spulber, 2018). Some standardisation organizations provide a place for agreeing on solutions based on a consensus of many actors and are open to all actors interested in a solution. In those organizations, participation in standards development is voluntary, and the use of standards is voluntary. Due to their way of work and following principles of transparency, openness, impartiality and consensus, effectiveness and relevance, coherence, and the development dimension6 – those organizations are often called voluntary consensus-based organizations for standardisation. All standardisation activities begin when some actor(s) propose a solution to others. Then through the process,
they come to a solution acceptable to everyone. Standards are not necessarily an expression of the highest expertise or requirements but rather an expression of what the parties involved could agree upon (Madelung & Andersen, 2013). That is why it is often said that standards do not contain the best practice or solutions for every participating actor but rather those with the highest degree of agreement – possible – at that moment.

The ILOs examples

K6.1., K7.1. 

 

Recommended Teaching Case studies/Serious games/Оther

Good practice

There are plenty of definitions of standards and standardisation. It is a challenging task to teach and understand the endless definitions. However, such richness in definitions of standardisation and standards can be a base for good class experience. Class discussion on the definitions (old and new ones) provided by formal organizations for standardisation, including international standardisation organizations (ISO/IEC/ITU), European standardisation organizations (CEN/CENELEC/ETSI), and National Standards Bodies (e.g., BSI, DIN, AFNOR, etc.) might be a good starting point. For example, the definition which describes a standard as a document, established by consensus, and approved by a recognized body (ISO/IEC, 2004),…,
can be used to explain that not all standards are documents, established by consensus, and approved by a recognized body (Hesser et al., 2010) which can lead to other definitions provided by other organizations for standardisation (e.g., professional, industry, and business associations, consortia, and fora working in different fields). Enabling students to critically analyze different definitions significantly raises their understanding of the topic. 

Recommended sources

Would you like to improve this content? Leave a comment!